|
|
Post by deergrower on Jul 29, 2004 19:03:11 GMT -5
Which one of these men are going to help the hunters and sportmans the most in the next 4 years?
|
|
|
|
Post by deerslayer11 on Jul 29, 2004 19:31:07 GMT -5
Probably niether, but my vote is going for Bush again.
|
|
|
|
Post by Shorthair on Jul 30, 2004 5:35:50 GMT -5
I wish all I had to worry about in this election was who be better for sportsmen in the Whitehouse. Unfortunately we are at war with islamic extremeists that want to either convert us to Islam or kill us all. I hope you all can see what socialist coward that John Kerry is. He is certainly not the Commander In Chief we need in this time of war. Any candidate that thinks putting our troops under UN control to get the European socialist wieners to like us again we never get my vote.
As far as protecting our hunting rights I feel sure that the Texan would be a better bet than rich sissy from Massechusetts (sp). At least Bush does own a Brittany, which is the first bird dog I ever owned.
|
|
|
|
Post by noonebil on Jul 30, 2004 19:37:10 GMT -5
Overall I don't believe either will help us. I do believe Kerry will erode everything I believe in though. That's why I'll vote for Bush.
|
|
|
|
Post by hunt4fun1 on Jul 31, 2004 23:18:23 GMT -5
Probably niether, but my vote is going for Bush again. Dude.....Bush is an outdoorsman.....he understands the value of a rifle or a handgun when in the field. Look at it like this; Bush may NOT do anything to help us as hunters but WE ALL KNOW what the Dems have done to us as hunters and gun owners. |
|
|
|
Post by Shorthair on Aug 2, 2004 5:50:20 GMT -5
He said he would sign the Clinton Gun Ban if the congreess reauthorized it and sent it to his desk. I'm telling you he is no true conservative.
He is a damn good Commander In Chief and we are at war so he'll get my vote.
|
|
|
|
Post by hunt4fun1 on Aug 4, 2004 16:19:32 GMT -5
He'll never do it....read the post up stairs......he MIGHT if he's pushed but it won't happen.
|
|
