|
|
Post by RedOak on Apr 22, 2004 6:31:02 GMT -5
This came up at a wargamer board I am a member of. Which if any Presidents did not use military force during their Presidency? So that means war does not have to be declared just that military action took place during their term.
|
|
|
|
Post by hunt4fun1 on Apr 22, 2004 8:45:47 GMT -5
The only one I can remember since I've been alive in Carter?
|
|
|
|
Post by RedOak on Apr 22, 2004 8:49:47 GMT -5
Nah Desert One would eleminate Carter. I think we were also already in Lebanon under his administration as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by hunt4fun1 on Apr 22, 2004 10:42:19 GMT -5
Yeah.....Hmmmmmm.
|
|
|
|
Post by deerslayer11 on Apr 22, 2004 11:41:27 GMT -5
Taylor
|
|
|
|
Post by hunt4fun1 on Apr 22, 2004 21:33:29 GMT -5
Damn, DS....
How friggin old are you?
|
|
|
|
Post by deerslayer11 on Apr 22, 2004 23:13:38 GMT -5
What? You dont remember back he was in charge?!
|
|
|
|
Post by RedOak on Apr 23, 2004 2:19:10 GMT -5
Taylor actually almost made it. Except for several Indian campaigns in the west.
|
|
|
|
Post by Shorthair on Apr 24, 2004 20:29:15 GMT -5
George Washington....final answer.
|
|
|
|
Post by RedOak on Apr 24, 2004 20:55:29 GMT -5
That is what I guesed. I figured Washington may have been early enough to preclude the Indian campaigns. However that is wrong. There were some Indian campaigns and the Whiskey Rebelion in Pennsylvania. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_history_of_the_United_StatesAlso we had Navy gunboats patrolling the Yangtzee river in China from roughly the 1880s up to I think WWII I know the US Navy history page says that in the creation of the campaign ribbon in 1927 they had been on station for roughly 50 years. So it looks like the answer is none. |
|
