Gun Task Force Serving Search Warrants

[MikeBell]

Gun Task Force Serving Search Warrants in California for unregisterd guns

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Heads up for Californians

Posted by David Hardy · 17 July 2006 04:54 PM

armsandthelaw.com/archives/20..._up_for_ca.php

LA County Gun Task Force Serving Search Warrants
LAPD & LASO Might Be Knocking On Your Door Next!

LA County Gun Task Force Serving Search Warrants

Officers from the Los Angeles County Gun Task Force in CA have begun serving search warrants on residents in that county who are suspected of holding un-registered "Assault Rifles" including 50 BMG target rifles.

If you or any of your friends have not complied with the provisions of AB-50 that require you to register any 50 BMG rifles you own, you may very well expect a knock on your door at any time.

This information was received from a former ATF agent in CA:

"I have a friend who had a search warrant executed by the LA gun task force at his apartment, which is located above a home, within LA city limits a few months back. This task force is headed up by ATF, with LAPD and LASO being the primary agencies participating. Pursuant to the warrant execution, one Springfield M1A with its' original flash hider attached and numerous .50 cal incendiary type bullets (Projectiles) were seized. My friend was not arrested at the time and led to believe the case might not even be prosecuted. The task force left his entire gun collection, which is extensive, with him at his apartment. A little more info here for you to consider. My friend has no criminal record of any kind, is a decorated Vietnam vet, is gainfully employed as a carpenter, and is law abiding.

A couple of weeks ago, the task force came back to his apartment and arrested my friend and charged him with five felonies. He was taken to jail where he remained for two days until his bail was set and met. He is charged with being in possession of an unregistered assault rifle, and in possession of destructive devices, and in possession of destructive devices within so many feet of a school. Five felonies under California law in total.

Being a retired ATF special agent myself, I contacted the case agent who happens to be a LAPD detective assigned to the task force. I asked him why such a chicken ##### case was being prosecuted. Why were they ruining my friend's life after his service to our country and the fact that he has no past criminal record. I asked him what happened to law enforcement using common sense and discretion in a case like this. The detective told me they didn't make the laws, but it was their job to enforce the law and that the DA has a no tolerance policy regarding firearms.
I tried to explain to him that the M1A rifle with its' original flash hider was legally sold to 1000's of people in CA before the assault rifle law was even enacted. Many of these original owners to this day do not know they are in violation by having the flash hider on their rifle. The detective didn't care. I explained that on at least two prior occasions I had contacted DOJ myself and had been informed the explosive bullets were legal in California as they are under ATF law, as long as they were not loaded into a case and able to fire. He said that was incorrect info and that under CA law the bullets alone are destructive devices and that each individual bullet could be charged separately."

During the past several months FCI has received several inquiries from people who are possibly California residents who have been asking what they should do because they hadn't registered their firearms before the required date. We have told everyone they need to contact an attorney to find out the best possible way to deal with this situation.

Also be aware that I spoke to Bill Ritchie at EDM Arms, Inc. recently and he had several customers who had purchased 50 BMG target rifles on a time payment program. The customers had not picked up their rifles before the expiration of the registration period and now all the firearms have to be turned in to the Dept of Justice in CA for destruction.

This is a very serious matter for owners as well as manufacturers. It appears that LA County Gun Task Force and DOJ in CA are looking for an opportunity to make an example out of an otherwise Law Abiding citizen. Don't let it be you. Seek good legal advice before you get a knock on your door when you least expect it. <<<<<

[deerslayer11]

Its past time for Cali to fall off into the Ocean aint it?

[hunt4fun1]

God......I hate Kalifornia.

And hey Mike....long time no see.....how are you?

I guess I would have to wonder how the DA's (Dumb Asses) could possible know who has unregistered weapons.....since they are, after all, unregistered?

And,of course, I'll still never understand how this does NOT infringe on the right to keep and bare arms.

[noonebil]

Bunch of zealots! They won't even consider approaching a real criminal. Same as in Louisianna. Slam the model citizen for a minor offense, but ignor the thugs all around. That's why I have no desire to go to California.

[Shorthair]

I'm with hunt4fun, how did they know who had what? If I remember right those goofy forms we fill out, when buying a weapon from someone with a FFL, are not to supposed to used to find out who has what. I thought the only time they could supeona the FFL form was after a gun was used in the commision of a crime. This man needs to get a lawyer quick. And where is the ACLU defending the 2nd Ammendment?? The people of California's right to keep and bear arms is being infringed.
California is a disgrace to this country.

[hunt4fun1]

shorthair said:

And where is the ACLU defending the 2nd Ammendment??/quote]


Yeah.....no Sh!t.......where's the ACLU now? They need to get A-CLU-E.
As long as it wasn't a homosexual tied to a fence in Montana or a black woman that missed a job opportunity because 40 other more qualified people applied, they want NOTHING to do with it. Typical Liberal organization.